tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post110867926449110049..comments2024-02-24T19:56:15.236-08:00Comments on heckasac: Fake presidentbecklerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09488884204422943486noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-1108747962938912742005-02-18T09:32:00.000-08:002005-02-18T09:32:00.000-08:00There's something about this Wal Mart/City Council...There's something about this Wal Mart/City Council thing that rubs me the wrong way. I'm not a big Wal Mart lover, in fact I would say we have more of a love/hate relationship. I love the low prices yet I hate how they treat their employees and destroy small businesses. But, putting one downtown just doesn't seem like a big deal to me. It would be in a mall filled with other big businesses who also don't give a care about their employees or the community. It just seems par for the course for our city leaders and their desire to keep families and poor people out of downtown/mid-town. "We only want something upscale to go in there." I hope Wal Mart does fight this one.<br /><br />HeatherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-1108738825313682962005-02-18T07:00:00.000-08:002005-02-18T07:00:00.000-08:00from this article
So in the end, why does this...from <A HREF="http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/02/man-called-jeff.html" REL="nofollow">this</A> article<br /><I> So in the end, why does this matter? Why does it matter that Jeff Gannon may have been a gay hooker named James Guckert with a $20,000 defaulted court judgment against him? So he somehow got a job lobbing softball questions to the White House. Big deal. If he was already a prostitute, why not be one in the White House briefing room as well?<br /><br /> This is the Conservative Republican Bush White House we're talking about. It's looking increasingly like they made a decision to allow a hooker to ask the President of the United States questions. They made a decision to give a man with an alias and no journalistic experience access to the West Wing of the White House on a "daily basis." They reportedly made a decision to give him - one of only six - access to documents, or information in those documents, that exposed a clandestine CIA operative. Say what you will about Monika Lewinsky - a tasteless episode, "inappropriate," whatever. Monika wasn't a gay prostitute running around the West Wing. What kind of leadership would let prostitutes roam the halls of the West Wing? What kind of war-time leadership can't find the same information that took bloggers only days to find?<br /></I>leonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08508206583409081710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-1108683790498793742005-02-17T15:43:00.000-08:002005-02-17T15:43:00.000-08:00did you notice that the published date was Februar...did you notice that the published date was February 20, 2005? weird.<br /><br />Okay. I'm easily distracted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-1108683773257174872005-02-17T15:42:00.000-08:002005-02-17T15:42:00.000-08:00Gannon's online nude photos are probably getting m...Gannon's online nude photos are probably getting more attention than his involvement in Valerie Plame's cover being blown. <br /><br />http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27730-2005Feb15.html<br /><br />http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1416370,00.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-1108682984776825962005-02-17T15:29:00.000-08:002005-02-17T15:29:00.000-08:00Ooooh! The public is gonna be OUTRAGED about this!...Ooooh! The public is gonna be OUTRAGED about this! Ha ha - just kidding. No they're not.<br /><br />millerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com