tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post1248602088599482670..comments2024-02-24T19:56:15.236-08:00Comments on heckasac: oh sees songbecklerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09488884204422943486noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-50687517220746111002008-02-20T16:44:00.000-08:002008-02-20T16:44:00.000-08:00I'm going on an all dry-dog-food strike until Pfor...I'm going on an all dry-dog-food strike until Pfork likes it. Oh wait, I already live on nothing but... never mind....<BR/><BR/>-"ChsWdhseAfrmsProdcr"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-63987617100398033112008-02-20T15:08:00.000-08:002008-02-20T15:08:00.000-08:00Quoted from an email I just got at work."There wil...Quoted from an email I just got at work.<BR/><BR/>"There will be a total lunar eclipse tonight! Hopefully today's drying<BR/>skies will give as a good view. Actually, the 7-7:52pm outlook for the<BR/>Sacramento area should be decent. High clouds area a possibility, but<BR/>should be increasing the hours after the eclipse. Cross your fingers,<BR/>and try to give this one a look. After 3 years of a lunar eclipse each<BR/>year, we now won't get another till December 20/21, 2010! Tonight's<BR/>sunset in Sac is at 5:49pm, with the moon rising at about the same time;<BR/>5:41pm toward the northeast. A lovely full moon it should be, too. The<BR/>eclipse will be visible to all moon-facing Earthlings at the same time.<BR/>The total eclipse lasts 52 minutes, starting at 7:00pm locally, but the<BR/>minutes prior and following offer that great crescent shape of the<BR/>Earth's shadow over an orangish-red moon. "<BR/><BR/>gAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-52285239155003918902008-02-20T11:48:00.000-08:002008-02-20T11:48:00.000-08:00finally, a translation I can understand!finally, a translation I can understand!becklerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09488884204422943486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-12697962016454480322008-02-20T11:10:00.000-08:002008-02-20T11:10:00.000-08:00I think he's saying "well, I write for Pitchfork &...I think he's saying "well, I write for Pitchfork & this isn't a band that's cool enough yet to where we'd look stupid trashing them so why don't I say something that makes it seem like I've got them all figured out & I'm not that impressed & later, if they get more respect, we can always pretend we've always loved them".<BR/><BR/>-millerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-52646312946281888922008-02-20T10:16:00.000-08:002008-02-20T10:16:00.000-08:00What does it have to do with Planet Claire and doe...What does it have to do with Planet Claire and does Planet Claire stand out as an especially bad B52s song? I'm not a big B52s fan, but it seems to me that besides the abomination of Love Shack, that they are just party fun music and all their songs are pretty interchangeable.becklerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09488884204422943486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-67449300412832398792008-02-20T10:07:00.000-08:002008-02-20T10:07:00.000-08:00He's saying it's not as bad as Planet Claire. The ...He's saying it's not as bad as Planet Claire. The "either" qualifies the "not this good, but not this bad" comparison.<BR/><BR/>If he had written "Perhaps it's worth changing your name over, but it's no Planet Claire" then he'd be saying it's OK but no B52s, which would be nutty.ffthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06816496421135325130noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-62009832677741756202008-02-20T10:01:00.000-08:002008-02-20T10:01:00.000-08:00i think he's saying it's not worth changing your n...i think he's saying it's not worth changing your name over but it's not as bad as planet claire either. so not as bad as the B52s.Liv Moehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17748816998076616109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7694733.post-73612828267487043502008-02-20T09:54:00.000-08:002008-02-20T09:54:00.000-08:00Yeah, it's confusing. Is the writer saying that t...Yeah, it's confusing. Is the writer saying that the oh sees are not as good as the B52s or not as bad as them?Jeff M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/04846971323356895103noreply@blogger.com