He starts really, really strong, with gorgeous ranch footage filmed in the Mexican state of Tlaxcala. He's got Malickian ways with filming nature, clouds, light, flora, fauna, the whole deal. I feel it was a mistake to cast himself in the lead. He said it was for financial reasons. He also cast his real wife and kids. His wife is good in it - he lacks onscreen charisma.
The movie is a bit of a slog. It's about a longtime couple's open marriage, and how a crush starts to upend it. It got mixed-to-bad reviews and a lot of criticism about the cringe-y power dynamics. He seemed pretty pissed off in interviews that people took it to be a male vs. female struggle. He saw the couple as equals, and that it was just a power struggle, but that gender roles were irrelevant. Yet the movie literally ends (this is not a spoiler) with two bulls fighting. How is it not about machismo and you end it like that???
I think he's a genius based on Silent Light so I'm still following his career. I think this movie would have been stronger as a two-hour movie with a different male lead. But I'm glad he's making movies and I hope he's at work on another one.
3 comments:
Putting Silent Light near the top of my queue. I really love Malickian stuff, it's unfortunate I usually gotta watch Malick to get it though, so this is up my alley. Not that I don't like Malick, but I don't love watching most of his movies multiple times.
I have been kind of off the Malick train but as much as I hate WW2-era stories the preview for the new Malick looks gorgeous.
Yeah,I haven't seen anything after Tree of Life. That's kind of his thing after maybe Days of Heaven...beautiful movies that I want to look at but don't necessarily want to watch. Wasn't there an IMAX movie about the "creation" of the universe that he was compiling out of stuff he shot for Tree of Life? I bet I'd like that.
Post a Comment